CANBERRA DOORSTOP - DECENTRALISATION

05 May 2017

E&OE TRANSCRIPT
DOORSTOP

CANBERRA PARLIAMENT HOUSE

MONDAY, 01 MAY 2017

SUBJECTS: Decentralisation and the budget

STEPHEN JONES: For the last three months, the National Party has been running around the country talking about decentralisation. Its only 7 days until the budget, and if this is going to turn into anything other than beer talk, then theres two things that the Government has to do.

The first is that theyve got to immediately announce a moratorium on job cuts Government job cuts in regional Australia. And the second thing theyve got to do is put some real money in the budget to pay for decentralisation.

Lets talk about the moratorium. Since the Government came to power, they have been consistently, year after year, cutting jobs out of regional Australia. Two hundred jobs quite recently in the tax office in Townsville; the Australian Valuation Office, over 500 jobs have gone from Centrelink, and I can tell you, those regional offices were not spared in the process.

So if the Government wants to do anything more than handpick a few jobs out of Canberra, and move them to a regional town, at the same time as theyre sacking people in Government jobs in those regional towns, they have to immediately call a moratorium on axing public sector jobs in regional Australia.

Let me talk about money in the budget. We already know the Governments ill-fated plan to move the APVMA to Barnaby Joyces own electorate has cost the tax payers $60 million. Well if were going to scale this plan up, its going to cost a lot more. And lets not forget, a few dozen jobs, moving from Canberra to Armidale cost $60 million dollars. If theyre going to scale this up, then there needs to be money in the budget.

So its time for the National Party to come clean. If this is going to be anything more than pub talk, theres got to be a moratorium on job cuts, and theres got to be money in the budget.

Happy to take questions.

JOURNALIST: Decentralisation has been shown to be really expensive, ineffective, and often reversed by the incoming Government. Is Labor going to pursue decentralisation, what do you think going forward the National Party wants to departments to justify their presence in Canberra whats your response that?

JONES: Labor is committed to creating jobs in regional Australia. Could you imagine what you could have done with that $60 million, if instead of trying to move a reluctant agency out of Canberra into regional Australia, and not create one job?

Can you imagine what you could have done with that $60 million in my town? It would have gone a long way to job creation projects, and much needed infrastructure, in a place like mine. There are a lot of regional towns throughout Australia who would have stuck their hand up for that sort of money for job creation projects as well.

JOURNALIST: What sort of money would you like to see in the Federal budget for backing this decentralisation policy?

JONES: I want to see a real policy, and not just pub talk. Theres got to be two things because the decentralisation policy means absolutely nothing unless youre going to call a halt on sacking public servants in regional Australia today. And thats already happening. We have seen the Government, on its watch, sack thousands of workers throughout regional Australia. Weve seen entire campuses of the CSIRO close down. Weve seen, 200 jobs in Townsville in fact, weve seen job cuts in the tax office, up and down the east coast of Australia, in regional towns.

So if were going to do anything than move one set of jobs to regional Australia at the same time as were madly sacking public servants in those towns youve got to call a stop to regional job cuts.

JOURNALIST: That $60 million for moving the APVMA would you like to see that in the budget, because at the moment weve only see a $26 million figure and that $60 is speculation as far as Im concerned.

JONES: The Government has to account decentralisation policy. The $60 million which is the cost of the APVMA move has to be in the budget, as well as, any additional money this will cost if they scale this plan up. And the Deputy Leader of the Nationals, Fiona Nash, has made it quite clear, that she wants a report in August from every Government agency. How much is it going to cost? That money has to be in the budget, if its going to be anything more than pub talk.

JOURNALIST: Stephen, can I just ask about the higher education changes that Labor are anticipating this week. What would it mean for university funding, for Wollongong, if it is cut?

JONES: We know that regional Universities are already under stress. The existing cuts to universities funding have seen an increase in student numbers, and a decrease in funding to those universities. What it means to Universities in a town like mine, it means to a University in Wollongong: bigger class sizes, and real pressure on the university to maintain its quality. If there are more cuts, it means more expenses for the students, and a lesser quality of education for the university.

JOURNALIST: What about students having to pay back their HECS? (Inaudible)

JONES: Look, I want to see the detail of what the Government is proposing, but from what I have seen, in the reports today, is bad news for universities, particularly in universities in towns like mine, which are already under pressure through Government funding cuts.

JOURNALIST: Do you support the decentralisation agencies like the Murry Darling Basin Authority in Canberra?

JONES: Im very happy to see the creation on public sector jobs in regional Australia, and where it makes sense, and where there is an agreement, and where it is going to make economic and financial sense to have those agencies move to regional towns. But its got to be a better proposal than the one that Barnaby Joyce put up last time around - $60 million and you havent created one new job.

JOURNALIST: What about Barnaby excuse in terms of ignoring the findings of a cost benefit analysis, and saying that its a nation building exercise, and visionary to simply forge ahead with moves like the APVMA given theyve got this broad brush policy now looking at all Government agencies.

JONES: If $60 million spent, without creating one new job is visionary, god help us.

JOURNALIST: Is that the standard Labor would use if you win the next election when it comes to moving departments. Not creating new jobs in regional areas, but moving people from Canberra to the regions its got to make economic sense is the only reason youd consider it?

JONES: We have been willing to look at placing jobs in new agencies in regional areas in the past. When we created the National Disability Insurance agency, we placed that in Adelaide, because Adelaide at the time was going through an economic downturn. They had the skills; it was a new agency they had to staff up it made sense placing that agency outside of Canberra. Well take it on a case by case basis.

Ive got to say, if you make jobs in Canberra the enemy of jobs in regional Australia, youre not starting on the right foot.

ENDS